Publishing in SIGDOC Proceedings

Link to the ACM Digital Library

Authors with proposals accepted for presentation at the annual conference are given the opportunity to submit their work for publication in the SIGDOC Proceedings. SIGDOC offers four different types of submissions for the conference proceedings: (1) Research Papers, 7-10 pgs.; (2) Experience Reports, 4-6 pgs.; (3) Industry Insights, 2-3 pgs.; and (4) Extended Abstracts (includes poster, panel, and workshop submissions), 1-2 pgs. Full descriptions of each type are available on the yearly conference website.

Why Publish with SIGDOC?

Authors are encouraged but not required to submit their conference presentation for publication in the double-blind peer-reviewed SIGDOC Proceedings. Published within the expansive and highly-accessed ACM Digital Library (ACM currently has over 100,000 registered members), SIGDOC proceedings papers gain high visibility, allowing opportunities for interdisciplinary readership that traditional publication avenues in our fields not indexed in larger libraries and databases might not provide. For context, here are some bibliometrics as tracked by ACM in their Digital Library for SIGDOC Proceedings alone (as of December 2019):

  • Publication years: 1982 to present
  • Total publications: 1,518
  • Average citation per article: 3.06
  • Downloads (cumulative): 478,629
  • Downloads (last 12 months): 15,150
  • Average downloads per article: 348.09

The Workflow

If you decide you would like to submit your work for review in the proceedings, please follow the workflow below. Microsoft Word is required for the publication process. Note: This is a new workflow established by ACM to start in 2020. LaTeX will no longer be supported by the Program Committee.

Step 1

Write your paper using the Submission Template (.docx). It is imperative that authors follow the embedded instructions in the sample text itself to apply the paragraph styles to the various text elements. It is also imperative that authors use the ACM Computing Classification System (CCS) to select their relevant terms. The text is in single-column format at this stage and no additional formatting is required at this point. Additionally, ACM has endeavored to provide an environment to all who wish to participate. To this end, we encourage all authors to add meaningful alt-text to all figures and tables in your article. With the alt-text added, you will ensure that qualified, but visually impaired reviewers will be able to provide a critical review of your paper. Note: For easier use, change “List: All styles” to “List: In current document” in the dropdown menu at the bottom of the style pane. This enables the author to only see and use the styles used by ACM.

Step 2

Submit your paper for review to the Program Committee via your “author” role in EasyChair by the submission deadline. The Program Committee will confirm receipt of the submission and then send the manuscript out for review. Note: The Program Committee reserves the right to reject outright any submission that does not attempt to follow the formatting guidelines embedded within the Submission Template.

Step 3

Upon acceptance, authors will receive an email notification to download the ACM Master Article Template (Microsoft Word). This is not a new document but rather a template/add-in to apply to the submission document you sent for review. Please choose the correct template version based on your platform [MAC 2011, MAC 2016, or Windows] and save the .zip file to your local machine. Open the .zip file and save the template file (acm_mat_word_v1.dotm) to your machine. Then, follow these instructions (links to a .PDF) to attach the ACM Article Template to your accepted submission version and prepare your paper (still in single-column format) for validation.

Authors may download Libertine fonts here:

Step 4

Authors will receive an email notification with instructions to upload their Camera Ready (finalized) source file set to The ACM Publishing System (TAPS). Download these instructions for the information on how to use TAPS. See also the page on TAPS best practices. TAPS will process your paper and auto-generate proofs of your article for your review. Final review and approval of your paper rests with the Program Committee. Due to the time-sensitive nature of the publication process, papers that do not follow the ACM template guidelines or that do not attend to accessibility are susceptible to rejection (even after peer review). Note: To make corrections to your paper, you may revise your locally-saved version of the paper and re-upload to TAPS. You do not need to revise the TAPS source file. 

Digital Accessibility

The SIGDOC Program Committee asks all authors to work on improving the accessibility of their submissions. For more information, please consider using SIGCHI’s Guide to an Accessible Submission.

How to Write Alt Text and Why

ACM is committed to publishing in an accessible format (see ACM’s statement on accessibility) that permits all its readers to have the content presented to them in a thorough and useful way. To carry out this mandate, ACM needs the assistance of its authors to help achieve this goal. Authors are required to provide “alt text” (alternate text) for floats (images) in their content so that those with disabilities can be given descriptive information for these figures that are important to the work. This benefits the author as well as it broadens the reader base for the author’s work. The descriptive text will be displayed in place of an image if an image cannot be loaded, and the alt text provides in-depth float descriptions to search engine crawlers, which helps to properly index the images.

To provide access to floats, the author must create the alt text for these elements in their document. Every float should have alt text provided unless it is solely decorative (decorative images still require alt text but authors can use null alt text (“”) or the check the decorative box).

How to Write Alt Text

(Adopted from article on

  1. Do not duplicate float caption text as it detracts from the normal flow of your article and can, potentially, confuse the reader.
  2. Describe the float as specifically as possible without going over 125 characters. Note: Focus on context and purpose. You can’t describe everything so let the context and function of the image guide your description. Alt text is, first and foremost, designed to provide text explanations of float images for users who are unable to see them.
  3. Keep it (relatively) short. The most popular screen readers pause alt text at around 125 characters, so it’s advisable to keep it to that character count or less (source:
  4. Use your keywords. Alt text provides you another opportunity to include your target keyword on a page, and thus another opportunity to signal to search engines that your page is highly relevant to a particular search query. While your first priority should be describing and providing context to the image, if it makes sense to do so, include your keywords in the alt text of at least one float on the page.
  5. Avoid keyword stuffing. Focus on writing descriptive alt text that provides context to the float and if possible, includes your target keyword, and leave it at that.
  6. Don’t include “image of,” “picture of,” etc. in your alt text. It’s already assumed your alt text is referring to a float, so there’s no need to specify it.

Additional Resources

Resources for how authors should describe their image to create the “alt text” for their float elements:

  • Image Description Guidelines
  • MathML Cloud is an open source tool that creates math content that is accessible to all readers. MathML makes mathematical equations accessible to everyone by eliminating the ambiguity of a verbal description of a picture.

Insert Alt Text in Microsoft Word

(Adopted from The University of Minnesota’s Accessible U):

In Microsoft Word: Add your image to the Microsoft Word document. Now, choose Format > Picture from the dropdown menu (or right click on the image and select “Format picture” from the menu). Click “Alt text”, one of the options on the side bar. You will want to add the full alt text in the Description field and a shorter title in the Title field. The title can help the reader decide whether or not they want to read the full description.

Please see our instructions within the ACM Master Submission Template for version-specific instructions for Windows and MAC.

Technical Support

ACM is happy to provide authors with technical help. Please direct your technical query to:

Citation Style and Reference Formats

Guidance provided by ACM. Please use the following formatting when preparing your proceedings manuscript.


The in-text citation style is as follows: For parenthetical citations we enclose the number of the reference, thus: [1]. Sequential parenthetical citations are enclosed in square brackets and separated by commas, thus [1, 2]. When a citation is part of a sentence, the name of the author is NOT enclosed in brackets, but the year is: “So we see that Burando et al. [1999]…”


Reference linking and citation counts are facilitated by use of these standard reference formats. Please adhere to the reference formats that we use for ACM publications. If you do not, and your paper is accepted, it will be returned to you for proper formatting.

ACM’s preference is for full names and not initials or abbreviations. Here are examples of the most common reference types formatted for ACM journals.

Note: For BibTeX examples see:

For a paginated article in a journal:

[1] Patricia S. Abril and Robert Plant. 2007. The patent holder’s dilemma: Buy, sell, or troll? Commun. ACM 50, 1 (Jan. 2007), 36-44. DOI:

For an enumerated article in a journal:

[1] Sarah Cohen, Werner Nutt, and Yehoshua Sagic. 2007. Deciding equivalences among conjunctive aggregate queries. J. ACM 54, 2, Article 5 (April 2007), 50 pages. DOI:

For a monograph (whole book):

[1] David Kosiur. 2001. Understanding Policy-Based Networking (2nd. ed.). Wiley, New York, NY.

For a divisible book (anthology or compilation):

[1] Ian Editor (Ed.). 2007. The title of book one (1st. ed.). The name of the series one, Vol. 9. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. DOI:

For a multi-volume work (as a book):

[1] Donald E. Knuth. 1997. The Art of Computer Programming, Vol. 1: Fundamental Algorithms (3rd. ed.). Addison Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.

For a (paginated proceedings) article in a conference proceedings (conference, symposium or workshop):

[1] Sten Andler. 1979. Predicate path expressions. In Proceedings of the 6th. ACM SIGACT-SIGPLAN Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages (POPL ’79), January 29 – 31, 1979,  San Antonio, Texas. ACM Inc., New York, NY, 226-236.

For a Patent:

[1] Joseph Scientist. 2009. The fountain of youth. (Aug. 2009). Patent No. 12345, Filed July 1st., 2008, Issued Aug. 9th., 2009.

For an informally published work (such as some technical reports and dissertations):

  • Technical Report:[1] David Harel. 1978. LOGICS of Programs: AXIOMATICS and DESCRIPTIVE POWER. MIT Research Lab Technical Report TR-200. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
  • Doctoral dissertation:[1] Kenneth L. Clarkson. 1985. Algorithms for Closest-Point Problems (Computational Geometry). Ph.D. Dissertation. Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA. UMI Order Number: AAT 8506171.
  • Master’s Thesis:[1] David A. Anisi. 2003. Optimal Motion Control of a Ground Vehicle. Master’s thesis. Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, Sweden.

For an online document/WWW resource: Website year can be found at the bottom of the website page or by viewing page properties/source to see when the page was last modified.

[1] Harry Thornburg. 2001. Introduction to Bayesian Statistics. (March 2001). Retrieved March 2, 2005 from

[2] ACM. Association for Computing Machinery: Advancing Computing as a Science & Profession. Retrieved from

[3] Wikipedia. 2017. WikipediA: the Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved from

For a Video (two examples):

[1] Dave Novak. 2003. Solder man. Video. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2003 Video Review on Animation theater Program: Part I – Vol. 145 (July 27-27, 2003). ACM Press, New York, NY, 4. DOI:

[2] Barack Obama. 2008. A more perfect union. Video. (5 March 2008). Retrieved March 21, 2008 from

For arXiv:

[1] Martha Constantinou. 2016. New physics searches from nucleon matrix elements in lattice QCD.  arXiv:1701.00133. Retrieved from